THIS IS NOT A ALL THE TIME ISSUE BUT IT DOES HAPPEN
In the past year, I have noticed an alarming trend where more and more individuals claim to have tested positive for THC on initial screens, which are then disregarded. The proper procedure for conducting a test is supposed to follow the guidelines set by Quest Diagnostics, as they claim to do.
According to Quest Diagnostics, they employ a two-tiered testing process. Initially, a portion of the hair specimen is subjected to screening using an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), a reliable and well-established method for routine drug testing. Subsequently, any specimens that yield a presumptive positive result during the screening process undergo confirmation using another portion of the hair specimen through methods such as gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) or gas chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS).
The confirmation screen with a cutoff of 0.1pg is only performed when the initial screen exceeds the cutoff of 1.0pg. After all, the term "confirmation" implies that proper screening should be conducted initially before confirming the presence of a substance.
Unfortunately, there are no mandatory guidelines that testing laboratories must adhere to, except in cases involving federal regulations such as the Department of Transportation (DOT). As a result, these labs can manipulate the system and get away with it. This is neither fair nor honest, and it is essential to raise awareness and advocate for change.
Many times, I have had to advise individuals to demand a physical copy of their test results, as labs often hesitate to provide it since it serves as evidence of their mishandling. It is disheartening to hear about cases where individuals should have been deemed negative but were instead unjustly affected by Quest Diagnostics.
Here are a few examples of individuals who should have tested negative but were unfortunately impacted by Quest Diagnostics' practices.
AS PAPERWORK STATES " THIS TEST WAS PER FORMED ..............................
0.6 is below 1.0 on SCREEN so no confirmation is needed it not would be ran if under threshold
how do you presume the SCREEN is positive if it is below threshold ? you dont unless you skip it .
SO quest skips initial 1pg screen to test you at 0.1pg basically nothing and we have discovered psychmedics has their own cheating method ...
psychmedics using a ng/ 10mg scale to confuse , the 5pg/10mg is actually equal o 0.5 pg /mg which is HALF the normal threshold of 1pg/mg .
Still not enough to keep hair razor from getting a negative result
UNDER INITIAL THRESHOLD TESTER HAD TO COMPLAIN TO SEE ACTUAL RESULTS
UPDATE 10-10-2018
WILL BE POSTING NEW BLOG ON NEW TACTIC GOING ON AT PSYMEDICS
HEAR IS ANOTHER LAB CHEATING PEOPLE
these assclowns show no initial cutoff level (1.0 pg ) and a confirmation threshold of 0.03 !!! standard is 0.1 pg WTF
Quest and psychmedics are admitting hair razor is effecting their positive result numbers by their dishonest practices .
Their are PLENTY of Hair Razor users who had same use and passed and they document it on our Hair Razor Reviews page
I have to take a hair test for custody. I had a fun weekend and dropped two E about 5 days ago. The test isnt for a couple months. What do I need to pass and where do I get it. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteget a consultation
DeleteThank you for this article. More people need to know how these companies are frauding the people and destroying lives. A small group of us are investigating this and have found even more on this. Anyone dealing with CPS, we have found evidence of lab results coming from location's that are empty buildings, doctor's stamp or signatures done by people who have lost their license to practice, results printed off the internet and names changed.
ReplyDeleteanytime your dealing with the state or attorneys watch out .
ReplyDeleteIs 5ng/10mg =,<,> 300pg/1mg.
ReplyDeleteAnd is. A 1700pg quantitative above or below the cut off of 300pg/mg